Impact of the Internet in Our Life

Available online at www. sciencedirelectroconvulsive therapy. com Computers in mankind Behavior Computers in homophile Behavior 24 (2008) 20052013 www. elsevier. com/locate/comphumbeh Impact of the earnings on our lives young-be bumpting(prenominal) and egg-producing(prenominal) personal perspectives Ann Colley *, John Maltby School of Psychology, University of Leicester, total heat Wellcome Building, Lancaster Road, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK Available online 30 October 2007 Abstract call down activity di? erences in net income price of admission and physical exercise decl ar been demonstrate in a turn of previous investigations. The canvas reported here extends this work by providing an analysis of the involve of the profit on work forces and wo workforces lives.A content analysis of 200 backings from workforce and 200 from wo man billet, on the topic of Has the profit changed your sustenance invited by a password web localize, was undertaken then examined for sex di? erences. Results showed to a great extent wo handss postings handsti wholenessd having made new friends or having met their partner, renewing dodderingish friendships, ingressing information and advice, analyse online, and shop and interlocking travel online, objet dart to a greater extent workforces postings computer addressed t palpebra the net income had helped or given them a c beer, positive socio- semipolitical e? ects, and b needball aspects of the technology.The results are see as supporting the view that the profits re arrays an generation of broader cordial roles and stakes in the o? ine world. O 2007 Elsevier Ltd. both(prenominal) rights reserved. Keywords profits sexual activity Gender roles Gender di? erences 1. creative activity The cyberspace is my job, my high street, my supermarket and my international amicable resort champaign (Fe priapic participant 63). Usage of the cyberspace hold backs to step-up worldwide. In the UK 57% of ho c haracterholds now have gateway, in compare to 46% four years ago ( issue Statistics, 2006).The * identical author. Tel. +44 (0) 116 229 7188 fax +44 (0) 116 229 7196. E-mail target emailprotected ac. uk (A. Colley). 0747-5632/$ see front matter O 2007 Elsevier Ltd. each rights reserved. doi10. 1016/j. chb. 2007. 09. 002 2006 A. Colley, J. Maltby / Computers in tender-hearted Behavior 24 (2008) 20052013 Digital Future Project in the US has demonstrate that 78. 6% of Americans went online in 2005, with an accompanying increase in the amount of time spent per hebdomad on the network (Centre for the Digital Future, 2005).A mo of factors have been launch to relate to gate and spend, including socioeconomic variables, demographic variables, and education (e. g. Bimber, 2000 Wasserman & Richmond-Abbott, 2005). One signi? cant celestial sphere of question over the last decade has investigated the contact of the net upon di? erent neighborly groups and inevitably work on sexual urge di? erences has been at the forefront, with concerns just well-nigh the presence and relate of a sexuality infract in mesh main course and example. A number of investigators (e. g. Sherman et al. , 2000) have investigated this sex activity snap in Internet occasion.Bimber (2000) found gaps in both access and ingestion among US adults, and reason that, magical spell access di? erences can be accounted for by socioeconomic and other factors that a? ect wo manpower and men di? erentially, the gap in drop was collect at least in part to sexual activity-speci? c factors such(prenominal)(prenominal) as the virile stereotype of entropy processors, cultural connexions surrounded by sexual practice and technology and sexualityed cognitive and communication preferences. However, at that place is suppuration say that the sexual urge gap in access is closing or has closed with much women glide path online, and that the gap in engross of the Internet is take over present fork upd whitethorn also be closing (e. . Cummings & Kraut, 2002 Ono & Zavodny, 2003 Wasserman & Richmond-Abbott, 2005). in that location continues to be a sex gap in usage in the UK the latest ? gures from adults in a nationally typical essay of UK households show that 40% of women had never apply the Internet in comparison with 30% of men, and 55% of women had utilise the Internet within the 3 months prior to the survey in comparison with 65% of men (National Statistics, 2006). In addition, there are barely gaps in the oftenness and nature of use that appear to dwell (Odell, Korgen, Schumacher, &Delucchi, 2000 Ono & Zavodny, 2003 Wasserman & Richmond-Abbott, 2005). One of the be intimates that was highlighted early on in investigations of the sex gap, concerns the negative e? ect of the link mingled with the Internet and computer technology. This area grew from work on gender di? erences in computer attitudes and use more than than(prenomin al)(prenominal) primarily, which showed more negative computer attitudes (Durndell & Thomson, 1997 Whitley, 1997), lower womanly self-con? dence and high computer foreboding among fe anthropoids (McIlroy, Bunting, Tierney, & Gordon, 2001 Todman, 2000).The possibility raise in the literary productions was that girls and women were being discouraged from utilize the Internet because of its delivery via a computer interface, and because of the association of the kinds of operations required to interact with it with traditional male technology. Indeed, computer attitudes and Internet attitudes have been found to be linked (Liaw, 2002 Schumacher & Morahan-Martin, 2001), and experience using the Internet has been found to predict both (Liaw, 2002). Durndell and Haag (2002) found higher computer self-e? acy, more positive Internet attitudes, longer Internet use and lower computer disturbance among male than female students, and gender was independently linked to Internet experienc e. Similarly, Joiner et al. (2005) found that a signi? cant relationship between gender and use of the Internet perched, after absolute for Internet identi? cation and Internet anxiety. This whitethorn be collectable to a number of other factors, and Joiner et al. insinuate that self-e? cacy and prevision of success may be fruitful areas to pursue. In addition, it seems that there are di? erential e? cts of experience upon anxiety in using the technology among men and women Broos (2005) found that experience decreased anxiety among men exclusively had little e? ect for women. Alongside investigations of the gender gap in use of the Internet, there is a growing body of search on di? erences in the use of the Internet for di? erent functions by males A. Colley, J. Maltby / Computers in mankind Behavior 24 (2008) 20052013 2007 and females. This is a crucial area to pursue in order to record the gender gap, since amount of use is inextricably linked to the functions erformed a nd the bene? ts of them for an individual. The number of potential functions of the Internet is very warm and the activities are diverse. The current top Internet activities in the US are e-mail (top), general sur? ng, access to intelligence agency program, shopping, reading entertainment news, ? nding information about hobbies, online banking, accessing checkup information, instant messaging and accessing information about and booking travel ( digest for the Digital Future, 2005).The available evidence points to variations in exploiting these functions of the Internet by its male and female users women are more likely to regard it as a tool or means to an end, while men regard it as technology to play with and hold (Singh, 2001 Turkle, 1984). For example, Tsai and Lin (2004) found gender di? erences in cognitions of the Internet among adolescents males comprehend its use as a source of utilisation or toy, while females took a more practical come and perceived it as a tool, technology or tour (providing the cleverness to navigate around di? rent sites and stack). One area of Internet use that has attracted attention among investigators is social communication. This is due to the association of functions facilitated by electronic communication with the communicative and communal aspects of femininity, such as the potential for use in self-expression and the facility to communicate readily with family and friends. Thus, it was pass judgment that women might engage with the Internet for such aims, disdain having lower self-e? cacy in relation to computer use.Jackson, Ervin, Gardner and Schmidt (2001) predicted that women would use e-mail more and men use the sack for information more, based on the greater interpersonal orientation of women and greater task orientation of men. This vaticination was supported in a large descriptor of Anglo-American undergraduates, even after computer self-e? cacy, loneliness and effect were controlled for. Was serman and Richmond-Abbott (2005) found that women use e-mail slightly entirely not signi? cantly more than men precisely that men use dress down rooms more. A uniform ? nding was obtained by Sherman et al. 2000) who found higher participation in blab groups among men, exclusively higher e-mail use among women, and these di? erences remained among successive cohorts of students in the late 1990s, despite generally higher use of the Internet. Womens preference for e-mail and mens for chat rooms re? ects the di? erent purposes of the two types of communication e-mail facilitates personal pinch with friends and family, while chat rooms can be unnamed and provide an arena for the scupper of power di? erentials present in society more generally (Wasserman & Richmond-Abbott, 2005). at that place are roughly null ? dings with pry to gender di? erences in e-mail use (e. g. Joiner et al. , 2005 Schumacher & Morahan-Martin, 2001), yet methodological di? erences between studies m ay account for such disparities. With respect to other uses of the Internet, there is evidence that almost of these too are gendered. Men are more likely to use game web sites (Joiner et al. , 2005 Sherman et al. , 2000 Weiser, 2000), transfer material (Joiner et al. , 2005 Teo & Lim, 2000), browsing or seek specialist information (Jackson et al. , 2001 Joiner et al. , 2005 Teo & Lim, 2000 Weiser, 2000). These ? dings provide additional support for the belief that mens use of the Internet is more task-oriented than womens, and the tendency for women to use e-mail more accords with their greater interpersonal orientation (Jackson et al. , 2001). They also support the male toy versus female tool distinction (Tsai & Lin, 2004). The research literature on gender and the Internet suggests that gender stereotypes play a powerful role in this as in other areas of benignant activity. Sherman et al. (2000) concluded 2008 A. Colley, J. Maltby / Computers in Human Behavior 24 (2008) 20052 013 hat we need to appreciate that online behaviors and attitudes are extensions of o? ine social processes and relationships (p. 893). If that is the case, what impact has the Internet had on the everyday lives of the men and women who use it? With respect to women, Morahan-Martin (2000) concluded that it has brought both call off and peril. The perils are an inevitable consequence of the features that empower liberty of expression and free access to information, since these also yield the ampli? cation of behaviors and perspectives that support the gendered power di? rential. What has been its impact upon men? Is the Internet just another arena in which gender is performed? The empirical research reviewed here has directioned upon usage and patterns of usage, rather than impact from the point of view of the user. The purpose of the info analysis reported here is to provide a picture of the impact of the Internet on the everyday lives of men and women. 2. Method 2. 1. Particip ants and data collecting On 24th July 2006, the BBC News website posted a topic for discussion on its Have Your severalize discussion section (http//news. bbc. co. k/1/hi/talking_point/default. stm), with the title Has the Internet changed your life? . The invitation issued to prospective contributors was to post personal stories about life in the digital age and how the Internet has changed their lives. The majority of contributors to this site used names rather than pseudonyms. There were substantially more postings from men, but the site was monitored until there were 200 postings from female contributors, then these together, with 200 postings randomly selected from among the male contributors were downloaded for analysis.The assay came from approximately 1200 postings during the period 24th July and 4th August. selection for analysis was only undertaken if the name of the contributor was uniquely male or female. The majority of the postings (92%) gave the town or country of origin, with 48% of the total postings being from the UK, 25% from the US and Canada, 7% from mainland Europe, and the remainder from the rest of the World. 2. 2. information mark A content analysis was undertaken to derive year frequencies for analysis.Coding was undertaken based upon content categories derived both from the real literature and from a hear of the postings. These categories were 1. Easy and tatty finish off with family and friends (through e-mail, instant messaging and so on ) 2. do new friends (through chat room, discussion forum, etc. ) 3. re-create penetrate with old friends/family 4. Met partner/spouse (through chat rooms, dating sites etc. ) 5. International news sites 6. habitual information acquisition/research 7. cure/ health check advice 8.Support for those with access/mobility problems 9. Entertainment (music, radio, movies, games, hobbies) 10. traveling booking A. Colley, J. Maltby / Computers in Human Behavior 24 (2008) 20052013 2009 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Online education job Banking Shopping farm out enhancement (increased e? ciency/? exibility) argument hunting Assisted biography path farm out in industry Studying online Socio-political e? ects (global access to information, democratization of information, bringing humanity together) 21. Negative e? cts (pornography, phishing, spam, viruses, bad use of time, addiction, reduction of face-to-face contact, handiness of illegal items, proliferation of uncensored information, etc. ) Reli strength of coding was established in a 20% specimen from the postings. Across all categories this yielded substantial conformity (Cohens Kappa = 0. 78), with no individual categories yielding ? gures below the substantial range (Landis & Koch, 1977). Gender di? erences were then examined using v2 tests. 3. Results Gender di? erences were found in the frequency with which a number of the categories were present in the postings (see Table 1).Chi square tests re vealed that a higher similitude Table 1 oftenness of appearance of coding categories by gender phratry Contact with family and friends Made new friends Renewed contact with old friends/family Met partner/spouse International news sites General information acquisition/research Therapeutic/medical advice Support for access/mobility problems Entertainment Travel booking Online education Trading Banking Shopping Job enhancement Job hunting Assisted vocation path Job in industry Socio-political e? ects Negative e? ects * ** % Men 25. 0 10. 0 4. 0 8. 5 9. 5 25. 5 2. 5 4. 0 12. 5 1. 5 2. 0 3. 0 6. 12. 5 6. 0 1. 5 12. 0 12. 0 12. 5 31. 0 % Women 30. 5 20. 5 20. 0 22. 5 19. 5 36. 0 7. 0 5. 0 10. 0 6. 0 6. 5 7. 0 7. 0 20. 5 7. 5 3. 5 4. 0 6. 0 5. 0 21. 0 v2 (1) n. s. 8. 53** 5. 50* 14. 97** 8. 07** 5. 18* 4. 48* n. s. n. s. 5. 60* 4. 98* n. s. n. s. 4. 63* n. s. n. s. 8. 70** 4. 40* 7. 05** 5. 20* p . 05. p . 01. 2010 A. Colley, J. Maltby / Computers in Human Behavior 24 (2008) 20052013 of womens postings mentioned having made new friends, having renewed contact with old friends or family members, having met their partner or spouse online, access to international news sites, being able to ? d information easily, accessing medical or therapeutic advice, studying online, booking travel online and shopping online. A higher proportion of mens posting mentioned that the Internet had played a role in their flight path, that they had found employment in the industry, positive socio-political e? ects and negative aspects of the Internet. 4. Discussion The ? ndings from this study extend those of animated research on Internet usage by providing information on what men and women perceive as important to them. In some cases the ? ndings accord with the usage data, while in others they do not.With respect to interpersonal communication, our ? ndings show no di? erence in the frequency with which Internet-assisted contact with friends and family was cited as being an aspect of the Internet which had changed the lives of men and women. It is worth noting however, this was the second most frequent category occurring in postings from both sexes. Studies of usage have produced a range of results on gender di? erences in the use of e-mail, although on balance the ? ndings have suggested slightly more or signi? cantly more use by women (e. g. Sherman et al. , 2000 Wasserman & Richmond-Abbott, 2005). Our ? dings suggest that the impact upon mens and womens lives may be similar, although of course there may be di? erences in the way in which men and women decree relationships electronically (Boneva, Kraut, & Frohlich, 2001). Di? erential impact is evident in womens higher frequency of mention of using Internet sites to make new friends, meet partners and renew old acquaintances, supporting the notion that womens interpersonal orientation will in? uence their Internet behavior (Jackson et al. , 2001). This ? nding is of interest in the context of mens greater usage of chat room sites found by Sherman et al. 2000) and Wasserman and Richmond-Abbott (2005), although our content category was not speci? c to chat rooms alone. It is nevertheless possible that men and women use such sites for different purposes and gain di? erent kinds or rewards from them our data suggest that women place greater value on the facility to expand their social networks, whereas it is possible that mens motives may be more mixed. Wasserman and Richmond-Abbotts suggestion that men may be more likely to use them to play interpersonal games and display power may be relevant here, and accords with ? dings that men are more likely to be blackguardly in chat room interactions (Whitty & Gavin, 2001) and lie about their sex, education, income and occupation (Whitty, 2002). There is a growing literature on the nature of online relationships and the characteristics of those who participate in them (e. g. Cheng, Chan, & Tong, 2006 McCown, Fischer, Page, & Homant, 2001) and it would be pro? table to examine gender di? erences in motivation to engage in interpersonal behaviors on the Internet in more detail. The most much cited positive e? ct overall was the ability to access general information on the Internet, although it was present in a higher proportion of womens than men postings. This result contrasts with the usage ? ndings (Jackson et al. , 2001 Joiner et al. , 2005 Teo & Lim, 2000 Weiser, 2000), but supports the notion of womens more practical approach and stronger perception of the Internet as a tour (Tsai & Lin, 2004), which may also explain their more frequent mention of news sites. The womens more practical approach is also evident in their higher frequency of mention of accessing A. Colley, J. Maltby / Computers in Human Behavior 24 (2008) 20052013 011 online education, therapeutic advice, booking travel and shopping. However, gender differences were not present in other practical uses such as trading, banking and accessing sources of e ntertainment. In order to explain the pattern of ? ndings, it is necessary to take into account the broader context of gender di? erences in social role demands and accompanying gender-related traits (e. g. Eagly, 1987 Eagly, Wood, & Diekman, 2000), in which the municipal vs. external distinction di? erentiates the focus and interests of women and men. Our data suggest that this distinction may underpin the impact of the Internet on men and women.The Internet in? uences womens lives more than mens in facilitating new interpersonal interactions, providing access to information from the domestic sphere, and facilitating the purchase of bullys, and in? uences mens lives more than womens by providing employment or assisting career cultivation. In addition there was greater evidence in the postings from men of cognisance of the global impact of the technology, for example, Never have so many people been empowered to make a real di? erence and get their message heard, (male participan t 159).This external awareness is also evident in mens more frequent mention of the negative impacts, A dis good is the anonymity. . .. idiots can spread their madness, insult others etc. all without fear of being uncovered. A 60-year-old shortly becomes an 18-year-old and vice-versa, (male participant 108). The gender di? erence in relation to negative impacts, however, raises several further possibilities. One may be that womens greater interpersonal orientation simply results in a tendency to emphasize the good rather than the bad in responding to the discussion issue on the site.Alternatively, womens more domestic focus may make them less concerned about the broader context and in particular the perils of the Internet in relation to power and exploitation (Morahan-Martin, 2000), so ironically, one outcome of the tendency of the Internet to re? ect traditional gender divisions may be to restrict womens awareness that this is the case. There are some limitations associated with using this kind of methodology which are dual-lane with studies of computer-mediated communication in discussion lists (e. g.Herring, 1993), and which relate to the lack of information on the sample. For example, no data on age is available and this may be a relevant variable in relation to impact, since junior users will have grown up with the Internet, while older users will have adapted to its use. However, there is no reason to assume that their distributions among the males and females in the sample should vary and introduce a systematic bias. There is no information available on experience, which may show a gender di? erence since womens far-flung use of the Internet has been more recent than that of men.Whether or how length of experience might in? uence perceptions of the impact of the Internet cannot therefore be answered here but would be a suitable topic for further investigation. Finally, the sample is drawn from those who visit a news website rather than users of the Internet in general so could be regarded as representing a part of the macrocosm with a particular pro? le of interests. However, news websites are visited by a signi? cant proportion of the population this was the third largest use of the Internet in a US survey for 2005 (Centre for the DigitalFuture, 2005) and 35% of a recent sample of UK citizens had accessed on-line news in the last three months (National Statistics, 2006). One signi? cant advantage of using this kind of data is that the areas appearing in the sample of postings are those that spontaneously occur to those submitting them, without make from an investigator. Consideration of the advantages and limitations of using the postings as data raises a further gender di? erence, which relates to the acquisition of the quota sample used. There were very substantially more postings on the site from men than women, even when ambiguous 012 A. Colley, J. Maltby / Computers in Human Behavior 24 (2008) 20052013 names were disco unted. While this may partly re? ect a residue gender gap in access, it also provides a clear illustration of the di? erent uses of the Internet by men and women, which are attributable to socio-cultural factors and therefore likely to remain (Wasserman & Richmond-Abbott, 2005). Interestingly, Fuller (2004) found that use of the Internet by men and women in the US for political activities, such as accessing information was slackly equal but that women were less likely to post to a political discussion group.It seems, therefore, that it is the opportunity to engage in an anonymous form of interpersonal interaction in which acquaintance and power may be displayed (Wasserman & Richmond-Abbott, 2005) that attracts more male postings to sites like the one studied here. The analysis of this sample of postings has produced a picture of what men and women who use the Internet regard as the areas with major impact on their lives. Our content analysis produced a number of gender di? erence s which show that the perceived impact of the Internet broadly re? cts the concerns and motivations associated with mens and womens gendered social roles. McGert (2000) argued that viewing online behavior as separate from o? ine behavior produces an unhelpful dichotomy, and in order to understand the impact of Internet technology it is necessary to cook it within the gendered practices that impact on peoples everyday lives. Our data support that view and the last of Sherman et al. (2000) that gender di? erences in online behavior will continue for as long as they exist more generally. References Bimber, B. (2000).Measuring the gender gap on the Internet. Social knowledge Quarterly, 81, 868876. Boneva, B. , Kraut, R. , & Frohlich, D. (2001). Using e-mail for personal relationships. The di? erence gender makes. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 530549. Broos, A. (2005). Gender and information and communication technologies (ICT) anxiety Male self-assurance and female hesitation. C yberpsychology & Behavior, 8, 2131. Center for the Digital Future (2005). 2005 Digital Future Report. Los Angeles USC Annenberg School. Cheng, G. H. L. , Chan, D. K. S. , & Tong, P. Y. (2006).Qualities of online friendships with di? erent gender compositions and durations. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9, 1421. Cummings, J. N. , & Kraut, R. (2002). Domesticating computers and the Internet. Information Society, 18, 221231. Durndell, A. , & Haag, Z. (2002). Computer self-e? cacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an tocopherol European sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 521535. Durndell, A. , & Thomson, K. (1997). Gender and reason a decade of change? Computers and Education, 28, 19.Eagly, A. H. (1987). grammatical gender di? erences in social behavior A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum. Eagly, A. H. , Wood, W. , & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex di? erences and similariti es A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Taunter (Eds. ), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123174). Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum. Fuller, J. E. (2004). compare in cyberdemocracy? Guaging gender gaps in on-line civic participation. Social recognition Quarterly, 85, 938957. Herring, S. C. (1993). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication.Electronic Journal of Communication 3, http//ella. slis. indiana. edu/herring/ejc. txt/. Jackson, L. A. , Ervin, K. S. , Gardner, P. D. , & Schmitt, N. (2001). Gender and the Internet Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44, 363379. Joiner, R. , Gavin, J. , Du? eld, J. , Brosnan, M. , Crook, C. , Durndell, A. , et al. (2005). Gender, Internet identi? cation, and Internet anxiety Correlates of Internet use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8, 371378. Landis, J. , & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159174. A. Colley, J.Maltby / Computers in Human Behavior 24 (2008) 20052013 2013 Liaw, S. -S. (2002). An Internet survey for perceptions of computers and the World Wide vane Relationship, prediction and di? erence. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 1735. McCown, J. A. , Fischer, D. , Page, R. , & Homant, M. (2001). Internet relationships People who meet people. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4, 593596. McIlroy, D. , Bunting, B. , Tierney, K. , & Gordon, M. (2001). The relation of gender and terra firma experience to self-reported computing anxiety and cognitions. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 2133. McGert, L. -J. (2000). Nobody lives only in cyberspace Gendered subjectivities and domestic use of the Internet. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3, 895899. Morahan-Martin, J. (2000). Women and the Internet Promise and perils. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3, 683691. National Statistics (2006). Internet access. Households and Individuals. London National Statistics. Odell, P. M. , Korgen, K. O. , Schumacher, P. , & Delucchi, M. (2000). Internet use amon g female and male college students. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3, 855862. Ono, H. , & Zavodny, M. (2003). Gender and the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 111121.Schumacher, P. , & Morahan-Martin, J. (2001). Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 95110. Sherman, R. C. , End, C. , Kraan, E. , Cole, A. , Campbell, J. , Birchmeier, Z. , et al. (2000). The Internet gender gap among college students Forgotten but not gone? Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3, 885894. Singh, S. (2001). Gender and the use of the Internet at home. New Media and Society, 3, 395415. Teo, T. S. H. , & Lim, V. K. G. (2000). Gender di? erences in mesh usage and task preferences. Behavior and Information Technology, 19, 283295.Todman, J. (2000). Gender di? erences in computer anxiety among university entrants since 1992. Computers and Education, 34, 2735. Tsai, C. -C. , & Lin, C. -C. (2004). Formosan adolescents perceptions and attitudes regarding the Internet Exploring gender di? erences. Adolescence, 39, 725734. Turkle, S. (1984). The second self Computers and the human spirit. New York Simon & Shuster. Wasserman, I. M. , & Richmond-Abbott, M. (2005). Gender and the Internet Causes of variation in access, level, and scope of use. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 252270. Weiser, E. B. (2000). Gender di? rences in Internet use patterns and Internet application preferences A twosample comparison. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3, 167177. Whitley, B. E. Jr. , (1997). Gender di? erences in computer-related attitudes and behaviour A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 122. Whitty, M. T. (2002). Liar, Liar An scrutiny of how open, supportive and honest people are in chat rooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 343352. Whitty, M. , & Gavin, J. (2001). Age/sex/location Uncovering the social cues in the development of online relationships. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4, 623630.